Lake Ontario Waterkeeper newswaterkeeper.ca

Backlash: The risks of speaking out

The backlash came fast and furious after grassroots groups released details of uranium contamination in human test subjects from Port Hope, Ontario in November. Private citizens, pundits and government officials condemned their neighbours for voicing concerns about uranium pollution.

Scientists and community organizers were labelled, "small, but loud, self-interest groups" They were accused of using, "terrorist tactics," and being, "willing to do whatever they have to get attention, regardless of the cost to the community." Even the local MP had harsh words, criticizing the groups for bringing, "needless, negative attention" to the town.

In the immediate aftermath of the November press conference, a reported 3,000 residents and Port Hope merchants took to the streets to "save Port Hope." Business owners and government officials dominated newspapers and television news broadcasts.

Whether calculated or merely coincidental, their collective response followed a pattern that Waterkeeper has seen in dozens of communities facing environmental concerns.

First, the individuals and organizations who spoke out are ostracized. They are labeled trouble-makers, do-gooders, or wackos - anything that might separate them from "ordinary folk". This makes it harder for you and I to identify with their message or to share their concern. (See, for example, repetition of marginalizing terms in the Port Hope coverage such as "self-interest", "terrorist", "minority", etc.)

Second, access to a fair forum is limited. The public (regardless of point of view) is offered no independent decision-makers, scientific experts, counsel, testimony under oath, ability to cross-examine other speakers, or opportunity to appeal.

The whole point of a fair forum - be it a panel review environmental assessment, a hearing at the Environmental Review Tribunal, or a traditional court of law - is to get at the truth. To lay all the facts on the table. To test the assertions of every side. To bring a community together.

In a town like Port Hope, where neighbour is pitted against neighbour and the most basic information is not available, a full investigation is the only legitimate option. Every community has a right to know what property is polluted and what the contaminants are. Every community has a right to know what is being done to clean up those contaminated lands. Port Hope is no different.

Check out last week's Living At the Barricades Podcast for an in-depth discussion on this topic, including examples from other communities on Lake Ontario where the "ostracize and contain" pattern can be found.

Recent News
Speaking out against pollution
Century-old Fisheries Act to get a facelift
Lead-land cleanup on horizon, MP tells city; Federal property in east St. Catharines may one day be used for housing
Road salt can have damaging impact on environment
Settlers and natives, united against the government
Lafarge wants hearing adjourned; Plan to burn tires faces opposition
Backlash: The risks of speaking out
Explanation offered for turtle ponds buffer size
Low-key album has high hopes for Ontario
Nuclear energy discussed in Parliament
Firm that operates Canada's 1st private nuclear plant wants to build in Alta.
Nuclear agency review may trigger privatization
Nuclear reactor workers at dramatically higher risk of cancer
New nuclear compensation package OK in principle
Canada joins international nuclear club amid criticism
Red Hill foes still fighting
Cameco, Russia to link on uranium mine pacts
City probe request on hold until ministry review complete
Commendation, concern voiced by callers; Talk show explores uranium issue
Look Out Point neighbour may ask for review
Decisions posted EBR regarding fish habitat and transportation design
Fisheries Act passes first reading
Canada to join controversial nuclear partnership
Darlington applies for new operating licence
McGuinty meets with Uranium Protesting Grandmother in Effort to Have Her
Pipe dreams of the past no deterrent to today's planners
Uranium mine will be safe, company tells Labrador community
Hunger-striking protester, 53, takes anti-uranium fight to Ont. legislature
Health concerns committee plans to hold meeting
Hunger striker haunts Queen's Park over uranium mine
Mine protester's plea doesn't sway premier; McGuinty says hunger strike by Sharbot Lake site opponent endangering her health

--------------------------------------------------------------

Waterkeeper.ca Weekly:

Waterkeeper.ca Weekly reflects the meaning and force of environmental justice on Lake Ontario. To contact the editor, please e-mail newswaterkeeper.ca. Lake Ontario Waterkeeper is a charitable organization, no. 86262 2750 RR0001. Please consider making a donation to support our work.